Free Evaluation

EB-2 NIW New Precedent Decision Published - Matter of Dhanasar

2016-12-28, BY wegreened

On 12/27/2016, the Administrative Appeals Office ("AAO") released to the public a new adopted legal decision (Matter of Dhanasar) for I-140 EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW) petitions. The new decision effectively replaces the previous NYSDOT three-prong test that had been adopted by the AAO for adjudicating NIW cases. 
 
The new decision lays out the following three pronged test for NIW applicants to qualify for a waiver of the job offer requirement:
 
  1. The waiver applicant's proposed endeavor must have both substantial merit and national importance.
  2. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that they are well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor.
  3. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements.
 
At our initial analysis of this new decision, we noted a few interesting aspects.  
 
First of all, the new first prong discusses whether the applicant's proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance. In the new decision, the "endeavor" appears to be the personal endeavor of the applicant instead of the field in general. So we need to show that the personal endeavor of the applicant has intrinsic merit and national importance, rather than the field as a whole. 
 
In terms of "national importance", the AAO alluded to the fact that an undertaking may have national or global implications within a particular field, even if the activities may be based in a certain geographic area. This may mean that petitioners/beneficiaries working in industry, such as process engineers, managers or consultants, might still qualify under the new framework if they can soundly justify the "national importance" of their proposed endeavor, even if they are not publishing papers as a pure researcher. Still, teachers, lawyers, clinical doctors that only treat patients are unlikely to qualify under the non-physician EB-2 NIW framework.
 
Second, the new 2nd and 3rd prong resemble the old 3rd prong requirement where USCIS evaluate applicant's qualifications and determine if it would be beneficial to waive the labor certification process. In the decision, USCIS used indicators such as funding from government-related agencies, membership, and media reports to support the new 2nd and 3rd prongs. When evaluating whether one is well-positioned to advance his/her proposed endeavor, USCIS focused on "education background, skills, knowledge, record of success in related to similar efforts; a model or plan for future activities; any progress towards achieving the proposed endeavor; and the interest of potential customers, users, investors, or other relevant entities or individuals."
 
It's worth noting that in the new decision, USCIS did not appear to put heavy emphasis on one's influence by using publications or citations as the primary factor. Rather, they highlighted evidence such as notable funding, awards, media reports and membership, similar to the criteria for EB2-NIW under Exceptional Ability*.
 
Overall, the standard for NIW petitions seems to be lower. Applicants with qualifications such as notable funding from government-related agency, membership, patents or media reports, now deserve a second look and see if they qualify for an NIW green card based on the new standard. Applicants with the aforementioned qualifications are welcome to contact us for a free evaluation. Email your CV to law@wegreened.com and our attorneys will provide free evaluation result within 24 business hours.
 
* Employment-Based Immigration: Second Preference EB-2, subcategory of "Exceptional Ability" (see here
 
1) an official academic record showing that the foreign person has a degree, diploma, certificate, or similar award from a college, university, school, or other institution of learning relating to the area of exceptional ability
 
2) evidence in the form of letters from current or former employers showing that the foreign person has at least 10 years of full-time experience in the occupation.
 
3) a license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation.
 
4) evidence that the foreign person has commanded a salary or other remuneration for services that demonstrate exceptional ability.
 
5) evidence of membership in a professional association or
 
6) evidence of recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field by peers, governmental entities or professional or business organizations.


The key to our success is the way in which we present supporting evidence and provide the highest quality petition letters. With over 11,000 I-140 EB-1 ( EB-1A Alien of Extraordinary Ability; EB-1B Outstanding Researcher or Professor) and EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver) approvals, our firm has acquired substantial information about USCIS decisions, which gives us significant advantage over firms that only handle a small number of cases.

Based on hundreds of approvals every month and our close track of USCIS internal memoranda, AAO decisions, and judicial review decisions, we have unique insight into the USCIS adjudication trends. Not only do we apply this insight into our approaches to our clients' cases, but we also take the time and energy to carefully review all RFEs (Requests for Evidence), NOIDs (Notices of Intent to Deny), approvals, and denials issued on our cases so that we can further increase our understanding of USCIS strategies and decision-making processes so that we can advise our clients on the best ways to proceed with their petitions.

While other petitioners and attorneys may still use templates to draft recommendation letters or petition letters, our clients' recommendation letters and petition letters are tailored to their individual credentials to best persuade a USCIS officer that our clients meet the requirements of the category they are applying under and therefore their petitions deserve to be approved. To provide the best EB-1 and EB-2 NIW services, our law firm only selects attorneys who have received their professional Juris Doctor degrees from the top law schools in the U.S. and who have garnered rigorous analytical skills through years of experience.


PREVIOUS
NEXT