Success Stories: EB-1A Petition Approved by NSC for Postdoctoral Fellow in Ohio in the Field of Molecular Biology
Client’s Testimonial:
“I am greatly thankful to your services for I140 application and get it approved.”
On April 28th, 2017, we received another EB-1A (Alien of Extraordinary Ability) approval for a Postdoctoral Fellow in the Field of Molecular Biology (Approval Notice).
General Field: Molecular Biology
Position at the Time of Case Filing: Postdoctoral Fellow
Country of Origin: India
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center (NSC)
State of Residence at the Time of Filing: Ohio
Approval Notice Date: April 28th, 2017
Processing Time: 6 months, 22 days (Premium Processing Requested)
Case Summary:
Discussing the importance of our client’s research, a principal scientist wrote: “…research affecting the quality and production of cattle has considerable implications for the US economy and food production. [Client] is a uniquely talented animal biotechnologist who has been responsible for major breakthroughs in cattle-related research, which are extremely valuable to the US.”
Several other renowned experts in the field of molecular biology testified to the research headway made by our client—a postdoctoral fellow from India— in understanding prion protein neuroprotective action and in realizing the benefits of myostatin gene silencing to achieve economic success in widespread agricultural sectors.
When our client first approached North America Immigration Law Group (NAILG), we assessed his credentials and found him to be a perfect fit for the EB-1A (Alien of Extraordinary Ability) category. We meticulously drafted the EB1-A petition which, apart from the recommendation letters mentioned above, contained the following information:
- His publication record of at least 44 peer-reviewed scientific articles (with our client being the first or corresponding author of 14 of them).
- The citation record of 318 accumulated from researchers all around the world who have referred to his findings in their own studies.
- We also detailed the 19 reviews he had conducted for various esteemed journals in the field, proving that he is a discerning judge of the work of his peers.

