Success Story: Clinical Medicine Researcher Secures NIW Approval Without RFE In Over 18 Months
Client’s Testimonial:
"I went with Chen immigration based on numerous good testimonials and feedback from colleagues. The initial evaluation was very smooth, and the following application process was clear and not overwhelming. They helped me highlight my strengths and present them in a legally sound manner. They guided me through the process and were very responsive to my various questions along the way.”
On March 23rd, 2026, we received another EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver) approval for an Instructor in the Field of Clinical Medicine (Approval Notice).
General Field: Clinical Medicine
Position at the Time of Case Filing: Instructor
Approval Notice Date: March 23rd, 2026
Processing Time: 18 months, 23 days (Premium Processing Upgrade Requested)
Case Summary:
The client earned I-140 NIW approval based on a proposed endeavor in clinical medicine focused on investigating the patterns, causes, and treatments of internal medicine diseases. We presented this work as nationally important because it addresses conditions that are difficult to recognize early, often mimic more common illnesses, and can lead to poor outcomes when diagnosis and treatment are delayed.
The client’s background helped show strong positioning to continue this work. At the time of filing, the client was working as a chief resident and planned to continue in a hematology-oncology fellowship role while conducting research, integrating findings into clinical practice, and publishing additional studies. That continuity mattered because it showed that the proposed endeavor was not speculative, but already connected to ongoing professional and research activity.
The petition also documented a solid record of achievement:
- 14 peer-reviewed journal articles, including 4 first-authored articles
- 36 citations
- at least 2 completed peer reviews
- major funding support from the King Abdullah II Fund
Two recommendation letters helped explain that significance in practical terms and reinforced the objective record. One recommender noted:
“Given this, his continued research in the United States helps achieve national healthcare objectives, and I do not hesitate to affirm my support of his work.”
These metrics were important because they showed more than productivity alone. The publication record demonstrated sustained scholarly output, the citation count showed that other researchers were relying on the client’s findings, and the peer review activity indicated that journals trusted the client’s judgment as a subject matter expert. The petition further strengthened this point by showing that several papers performed especially well compared with same-year clinical medicine benchmarks, supporting the argument that the client’s influence was stronger than raw totals alone might suggest.
We congratulate the client on this excellent NIW approval and are proud to have helped present a focused and persuasive case showing that the client’s work satisfies the NIW standard.