9 I-140 Approvals After RFE on March 12, 2026
2026-03-13, BY wegreened
A Request for Evidence, or RFE, is not a final adjudication outcome. In many I-140 cases, it reflects the adjudicating officer’s need for clearer evidentiary linkage, tighter legal framing, or a more direct explanation of how the petition satisfies the governing standard. RFEs often arise even in strong cases, especially when the procedural history includes refiling, prior withdrawal, service center movement, or unusually long review timelines.
The following nine success stories highlight I-140 approvals secured after RFE-related complications. This group includes three EB-1A approvals and six NIW approvals. Together, these cases show that approval after an RFE depends not only on the applicant’s qualifications but also on whether the filing remains coherent, well supported, and durable enough to withstand closer scrutiny.
Cases With Inherent Challenges
Prior RFE History, Withdrawal, and Refiling
These success stories include an EB-1A matter that had previously received an RFE and was later withdrawn, but eventually approved after refiling. It also features an NIW case that moved forward to approval despite earlier RFE activity in another category. Such procedural histories highlight the critical importance of consistency, timing, and ensuring a subsequent filing can stand strongly on its own.
Repeated Service Center Transfers During Review
Several approvals did not follow a simple adjudicative path. Multiple cases bounced from the Nebraska Service Center to the Texas Service Center and back again before approval. Procedural movement of this kind complicates adjudication, as the case file must remain internally consistent even as review shifts across locations and officers.
Mixed Processing Strategies and Very Long Regular Timelines
These approvals reflect sharply different processing paths after RFE. Some cases proceeded through premium processing upgrades or upfront premium processing, while others remained in regular processing and reached timelines of 613, 761, and 834 days. That contrast shows there is no single procedural route to approval after an RFE, and that strong case organization remains important regardless of processing speed.
Uneven Research Profiles Under Similar Scrutiny
The approved cases span vastly different credential profiles. While some applicants had publication and citation records in the hundreds or thousands, others secured approval with much smaller research footprints, including one NIW case with only 2 publications and 46 citations. This range underscores a recurring feature of post-RFE I-140 adjudication: officers do not review numbers alone, but rather assess whether the full evidentiary picture is credible under the relevant standard.
EB-1A Approvals After RFE (3)
#1: EB-1A in Advanced Engineering Materials
This EB-1A approval involved an applicant from India residing in the United States, working as a Lead Engineer in Composite Mechanics in industry and proposing to continue in the same employment. The case followed a complex procedural path, as an earlier EB-1A filing had received an RFE from Officer XM1291 and was later withdrawn before the refile approval was secured.
The applicant held a Ph.D. in a STEM field and presented 16 publications, 264 citations, and a latest peer-reviewed publication from 2020, supported by six recommendation letters.
The petition was adjudicated at the Texas Service Center and upgraded with a premium processing upgrade.
Notable: This case stands out for overcoming an earlier RFE and withdrawal history, relying on a research profile where the latest peer-reviewed publication dates back to 2020.
#2: EB-1A in Civil Engineering
Working as a Materials Engineer in industry and proposing to remain in the same role, this Indian-born applicant residing in the United States successfully navigated an RFE from Officer XM2259 to secure an EB-1A approval.
The petition did not remain in a single adjudicative track, transferring from the Nebraska Service Center to the Texas Service Center and back again to the Nebraska Service Center.
Holding a STEM Ph.D., the applicant submitted 6 publications, 418 citations, and a latest peer-reviewed publication from 2024.
The case proceeded with a premium processing upgrade, and its path to approval involved both officer-level scrutiny and repeated transfers between service centers.
Notable: This approval involved multiple service center transfers.
#3: EB-1A in Child Neurology
This EB-1A approval involved an applicant from India residing in the United States, serving as an Assistant Professor and proposing to continue in the same role. The petition was filed in Child Neurology and received an RFE from Officer EX0718 before ultimately being approved.
The applicant held an M.B.B.S. in a non-STEM field and presented a substantial scholarly record of 26 publications, 435 citations, and a latest peer-reviewed publication from 2024, along with four recommendation letters.
The case was adjudicated at the Nebraska Service Center and proceeded with upfront premium processing.
Notable: The applicant secured EB-1A approval after an RFE, utilizing an M.B.B.S. background rather than a traditional doctoral pathway.
NIW Approvals After RFE (6)
#4: NIW in Materials Science
This NIW approval involved a Chinese-born Postdoctoral Scholar residing in the United States and proposing to continue in the same role. The applicant initially filed for NIW and subsequently filed an EB1A petition. The NIW case was approved, while the EB1A case received an RFE.
Holding a STEM Ph.D., this applicant presented a strong research profile with 65 publications, 2,163 citations, and a latest peer-reviewed publication from 2023, supported by two recommendation letters.
The case proceeded through regular processing at the Nebraska Service Center and reached a lengthy 761-day timeline before approval.
Notable: This case stands out for pairing a strong citation record with an unusually long 761-day regular adjudication path.
#5: NIW in Electrical Engineering
This NIW approval involved an applicant from China residing in the United States, employed as a Staff Health Algorithm Engineer in industry and proposing to continue in the same role. The petition received an RFE from Officer XM2533 before approval.
The applicant held a STEM Ph.D., and presented 4 publications, 222 citations, and a latest peer-reviewed publication from 2018, supported by four recommendation letters.
The case proceeded with a premium processing upgrade and moved through multiple transfers, from the Nebraska Service Center to the Texas Service Center and back again to the Nebraska Service Center.
Notable: This petition succeeded after an RFE despite the applicant’s latest peer-reviewed publication dating back to 2018 and multiple service center transfers.
#6: NIW in Computer Science
This NIW approval involved a Postdoctoral Researcher born and residing in France, who proposes to transition to a Research Scientist role. The petition received an RFE from Officer XM1926 in Computer Science.
The applicant held a Ph.D. in a STEM field and presented a modest research record that included 2 publications, 46 citations, a latest peer-reviewed publication from 2023, and 4 recommendation letters.
The case was adjudicated at the Texas Service Center and proceeded without premium processing, with a total documented timeline of 613 days.
Notable: This NIW was approved after an RFE despite a particularly small publication record and an extended 613-day regular processing timeline.
#7: NIW in Materials Engineering
This NIW approval was secured by an applicant from China residing in the United States, who works as an Associate Scientist and proposes to transition to a Research Scientist role. The petition overcame an RFE from Officer XM2417 before approval.
The applicant held a master’s degree in a STEM field and presented 6 publications, 58 citations, with 2 testimonial letters and a latest peer-reviewed publication from 2025.
The case moved from the Nebraska Service Center to the Texas Service Center and then back to the Nebraska Service Center, and the strategy included an upfront premium processing.
Notable: This approval involved multiple service center transfers.
#8: NIW in Industrial and Production Engineering
An applicant from Bangladesh residing in the United States, currently working as a Research Assistant and proposing to continue in the same employment, secured NIW approval after receiving an RFE from Officer XM2513.
The applicant held a Ph.D. in a STEM field and presented 17 publications, 80 citations, and a latest peer-reviewed publication from 2023, without supporting letters.
The case remained at the Texas Service Center under regular processing and had a notably long timeline of 834 days.
Notable: This NIW approval came after RFE and was achieved without recommendation or testimonial letters, following 834 days in regular processing.
#9: NIW in Materials Science
This Indian-born Postdoctoral Research Associate, residing in the United States and proposing to remain in the same role, has secured an NIW approval after receiving an RFE from Officer XM1914.
The applicant held a Ph.D. in a STEM field and submitted 15 publications, 210 citations, and a latest peer-reviewed publication from 2024.
The case proceeded with a premium processing upgrade and was transferred from the Nebraska Service Center to the Texas Service Center and then back to the Nebraska Service Center.
Notable: This approval involved multiple service center transfers and was approved without recommendation or testimonial letters.The key to our success is the way in which we present supporting evidence and provide the highest quality petition letters. With over 64,000 I-140 EB-1 ( EB-1A Alien of Extraordinary Ability; EB-1B Outstanding Researcher or Professor), EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver) and O-1 approvals, our firm has acquired substantial information about USCIS decisions, which gives us significant advantage over firms that only handle a small number of cases.
Based on our close track of USCIS internal memoranda, AAO decisions, and judicial review decisions, we have unique insight into the USCIS adjudication trends. Not only do we apply this insight into our approaches to our clients' cases, but we also carefully review all RFEs (Requests for Evidence), NOIDs (Notices of Intent to Deny), approvals, and denials issued on our cases so that we can further increase our understanding of USCIS strategies and decision-making processes. With the insight, we are able to advise our clients on the best ways to proceed with their petitions.
While other petitioners and attorneys may still use templates to draft recommendation letters or petition letters, our clients' recommendation letters and petition letters are tailored to their individual credentials to best persuade a USCIS officer that our clients meet the requirements of the category they are applying under and therefore their petitions deserve to be approved. To provide the best EB-1 and EB-2 NIW services, our law firm only selects attorneys who have received their professional Juris Doctor degrees from the top law schools in the U.S. and who have garnered rigorous analytical skills through years of experience.