4 I-140 Approvals After RFE on May 15, 2026
A Request for Evidence, or RFE, is not a final adjudication outcome, but it reflects a more demanding stage of review in the I-140 adjudication process. In employment-based immigrant petitions, an RFE generally indicates that the adjudicating officer requires a clearer articulation of eligibility, a stronger evidentiary connection between the applicant’s accomplishments and the governing legal standard, or additional clarification regarding the applicant’s proposed work and broader impact. Once a petition enters this stage, the filing is evaluated under heightened scrutiny and must remain strategically positioned, internally consistent, and well-supported to ultimately secure approval.
The following success stories highlight four I-140 approvals achieved after RFE review or prior adverse adjudication history, including one EB-1A approval, one EB-1B approval, and two NIW approvals. These cases reflect varied scholarly profiles, prior denial history, differing processing timelines, and petitions proceeding with relatively limited supporting documentation, demonstrating that approval remains achievable even after intensified scrutiny and procedural complications.
Cases With Inherent Challenges
Prior Denial Before Subsequent Approval
One EB-1B approval was secured after the applicant’s earlier EB-1A petition had gone through RFE review and was ultimately denied. Prior denial history increases adjudicative complexity because the subsequent filing must overcome earlier concerns while presenting a clearer and more persuasive evidentiary record under renewed review.
Limited Scholarly Metrics and Supporting Documentation
Some approvals involved applicants with developing or comparatively modest scholarly profiles, including limited citation counts and only a small number of recommendation letters. In such cases, the petitions relied more heavily on the consistency of the applicant’s professional background, technical specialization, and the overall coherence of the evidentiary presentation during RFE review.
Varied Processing Paths and Adjudicative Timelines
The approvals also reflected varied adjudicative paths, including both upfront premium processing filings and petitions that remained pending for extended periods without premium processing. These differing procedural circumstances required the petitions to maintain consistency and evidentiary strength throughout the adjudication process despite varying review timelines and officer scrutiny.
EB-1A Approval After RFE (1)
#1: EB-1A in Physics
This EB-1A approval involved an Associate Research Scholar, born in India and residing in the United States, who proposes to continue in the same role. Filed in Physics, the petition received an RFE from Officer EX5199 before approval was ultimately secured.
The applicant held a STEM Ph.D. and presented a strong scholarly profile consisting of 28 publications and 479 citations, including peer-reviewed work published as recently as 2024. The filing was supported by four recommendation letters and proceeded without testimonial letters.
The petition was adjudicated through the Texas Service Center with upfront premium processing.
EB-1B Approval After RFE (1)
#2: EB-1B in Mechanical Engineering
This EB-1B approval involved an Assistant Professor, born in India and residing in the United States, who proposes to continue in the same role. Filed in Mechanical Engineering, the approval followed a prior EB-1A petition that had received an RFE from Officer XM1452 and was ultimately denied before the EB-1B petition was later approved.
The applicant held a STEM Ph.D. and presented a persuasive scholarly profile consisting of 7 publications and 482 citations, with peer-reviewed work published as recently as 2023. The filing included five recommendation letters and proceeded without testimonial letters.
The petition was adjudicated through the Nebraska Service Center without premium processing and remained pending for 390 days before approval was secured.
Notable: This approval is notable for achieving EB-1B approval after a prior EB-1A petition received an RFE and was denied.
NIW Approvals After RFE (2)
#3: NIW in Electrical Engineering
This NIW approval involved a Postdoctoral Researcher, born in Nepal and residing in the United States, who proposes to continue in the same role. Filed in Electrical Engineering, the petition received an RFE from Officer XM2417 before approval was ultimately secured.
The applicant held a STEM master’s degree and presented a developing scholarly profile consisting of 7 publications and 22 citations, including peer-reviewed work published in 2024. The filing was supported by two recommendation letters and proceeded without testimonial letters.
The case proceeded through the Nebraska Service Center with a premium processing upgrade.
#4: NIW in Artificial Intelligence
This NIW approval involved a Senior Machine Learning Engineer in industry, born in China and residing in the United States, who proposes to continue in the same role. Filed in Artificial Intelligence, the petition received an RFE from the Texas Service Center before approval was ultimately achieved.
The applicant held a STEM Ph.D. and presented a credible scholarly record consisting of 8 publications and 186 citations, with peer-reviewed work published as recently as 2023. The filing included two recommendation letters and no testimonial letters.
The petition was adjudicated through the Nebraska Service Center with upfront premium processing.
The key to our success is the way in which we present supporting evidence and provide the highest quality petition letters. With over 64,000 I-140 EB-1 ( EB-1A Alien of Extraordinary Ability; EB-1B Outstanding Researcher or Professor), EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver) and O-1 approvals, our firm has acquired substantial information about USCIS decisions, which gives us significant advantage over firms that only handle a small number of cases.
Based on our close track of USCIS internal memoranda, AAO decisions, and judicial review decisions, we have unique insight into the USCIS adjudication trends. Not only do we apply this insight into our approaches to our clients' cases, but we also carefully review all RFEs (Requests for Evidence), NOIDs (Notices of Intent to Deny), approvals, and denials issued on our cases so that we can further increase our understanding of USCIS strategies and decision-making processes. With the insight, we are able to advise our clients on the best ways to proceed with their petitions.
While other petitioners and attorneys may still use templates to draft recommendation letters or petition letters, our clients' recommendation letters and petition letters are tailored to their individual credentials to best persuade a USCIS officer that our clients meet the requirements of the category they are applying under and therefore their petitions deserve to be approved. To provide the best EB-1 and EB-2 NIW services, our law firm only selects attorneys who have received their professional Juris Doctor degrees from the top law schools in the U.S. and who have garnered rigorous analytical skills through years of experience.



