5 Approvals After RFE on April 10, 2026
A Request for Evidence, or RFE, is not a final adjudication outcome. In the employment-based visa context, it often reflects the adjudicating officer’s need for a clearer explanation of eligibility, a stronger evidentiary connection between the applicant’s record and the governing legal standard, or a more persuasive account of the applicant’s proposed work and future role. Even when approval is ultimately secured, an RFE usually marks a more demanding stage of review in which the petition must remain coherent and persuasive under closer scrutiny.
The following success stories highlight five approvals secured after RFE review, consisting of four NIW cases and one O-1A case. These cases reflect various forms of adjudicative complexity, ranging from multi-center transfers to approvals for candidates in non-STEM fields.
Cases With Inherent Challenges
Cross-Service-Center Transfers and Procedural Complexity
Several of the approved matters involved significant procedural movement between service centers. Three petitions were initially filed with the Nebraska Service Center, transferred to the Texas Service Center, and eventually returned to the Nebraska Service Center before securing final approval. Maintaining internal consistency across these transfers adds a layer of difficulty, as the record must remain persuasive even when moving between different adjudicative environments.
Diversity in Professional Fields and Academic Backgrounds
The approvals demonstrate that success under RFE review is possible across widely different disciplines, including Autonomous Systems, Corporate Governance, and Blockchain Technology. Notably, while most cases involved STEM backgrounds, several approvals were secured for applicants in non-STEM fields. This shows that the national interest can be persuasively argued beyond traditional scientific research.
Different Premium Processing Paths
These approvals also did not follow one premium processing pattern. Three petitions moved forward with upfront premium processing, while the other two proceeded through premium processing upgrades. That variation is notable because it reflects different filing strategies and adjudicative timelines, yet all five petitions still secured approval after a more demanding review stage.
Wide Variation in Scholarly and Letter Support
Within the four NIW cases, the applicants presented scholarly records ranging from 4 to 7 publications and from 20 to 76 citations, with the latest peer-reviewed work dating from 2023 to 2025. Their evidentiary support also varied considerably, from filings with no recommendation or testimonial letters at all to matters supported by multiple recommendation letters and testimonial letters. That spread is important because it shows these approvals did not turn on a single publication count, citation level, or letter strategy.
NIW Approvals After RFE (4)
#1: NIW in Autonomous Systems
This NIW approval involved a Ph.D. candidate born in Pakistan and residing in the United States, who proposes to work as a Professor. Filed in the Autonomous Systems, the petition received an RFE from Officer EX5004 before ultimately securing approval.
The applicant held a STEM master’s degree and presented a scholarly record consisting of 4 publications and 20 citations, with the most recent peer-reviewed work published in 2023. The case proceeded without any supporting letters.
The matter remained at the Nebraska Service Center and was utilized with a premium processing upgrade.
Notable: This case is notable for securing an NIW approval after an RFE review with a relatively modest publication and citation record and without any recommendation or testimonial letters.
#2: NIW in Corporate Governance Structures
This approval involved an Assistant Professor of Finance and Supply Chain Management born in Vietnam and residing in the United States, who proposes to remain in the same role. Filed in Corporate Governance Structures, the petition received an RFE from Officer XM1988 before approval was secured.
The applicant held a non-STEM Ph.D. and presented a scholarly record of 5 publications and 39 citations, with the latest peer-reviewed publication dating to 2025. The case did not include any supporting letters.
The matter utilized an upfront premium processing and followed a complex procedural path, moving from the Nebraska Service Center to the Texas Service Center and back to the Nebraska Service Center.
Notable: This approval is notable for securing NIW approval after RFE review in a non-STEM field, without recommendation or testimonial letters, and after multiple service-center transfers.
#3: NIW in Blockchain Technology
A Lecturer of Finance born in Bangladesh and residing in the United States, this applicant proposes to remain in the same role. The petition was filed in Blockchain Technology and received an RFE from Officer XM1988 before approval was ultimately granted.
The applicant held a non-STEM master’s degree and presented a record of 7 publications and 22 citations, with recent work published in 2025. The evidentiary presentation was supported by three recommendation letters and one testimonial letter.
The case proceeded with a premium processing upgrade and followed a complex procedural route, moving from the Nebraska Service Center to the Texas Service Center and then back to the Nebraska Service Center.
Notable: This approval is notable for securing NIW approval after RFE review for an applicant in a non-STEM field that went through a multi-service-center adjudicative path.
#4: NIW in Neuroscience
This NIW approval involved a Postdoctoral Fellow born in Canada and residing in the United States, who proposes to transition into a role as an Instructor. Filed in Neuroscience, the petition received an RFE from Officer XM2417 before securing approval.
The applicant held a STEM Ph.D. and presented a developed scholarly profile with 7 publications and 76 citations, including peer-reviewed work as recent as 2025. The filing was supported by one recommendation letter and three testimonial letters.
The matter utilized an upfront premium processing and followed a multi-step procedural path, transferring from the Nebraska Service Center to the Texas Service Center and then back to the Nebraska Service Center.
Notable: This approval is notable for combining post-RFE approval with repeated service center transfers.
O-1A Approvals After RFE (1)
#5: O-1A in Human-Centered Robotics
This O-1A approval involved a Postdoctoral Fellow born in Italy and residing in the United States, who proposes to transition to a Senior Robotics Systems Engineer in industry. Filed in Human-Centered Robotics, the case received an RFE from the Vermont Service Center before ultimately being approved.
The applicant held a STEM Ph.D. and presented a substantial scholarly record consisting of 17 publications and 376 citations, with the latest peer-reviewed publication dating to 2025. The case was supported by four recommendation letters and no testimonial letters.
The matter remained at the Vermont Service Center with upfront premium processing.
The key to our success is the way in which we present supporting evidence and provide the highest quality petition letters. With over 64,000 I-140 EB-1 ( EB-1A Alien of Extraordinary Ability; EB-1B Outstanding Researcher or Professor), EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver) and O-1 approvals, our firm has acquired substantial information about USCIS decisions, which gives us significant advantage over firms that only handle a small number of cases.
Based on our close track of USCIS internal memoranda, AAO decisions, and judicial review decisions, we have unique insight into the USCIS adjudication trends. Not only do we apply this insight into our approaches to our clients' cases, but we also carefully review all RFEs (Requests for Evidence), NOIDs (Notices of Intent to Deny), approvals, and denials issued on our cases so that we can further increase our understanding of USCIS strategies and decision-making processes. With the insight, we are able to advise our clients on the best ways to proceed with their petitions.
While other petitioners and attorneys may still use templates to draft recommendation letters or petition letters, our clients' recommendation letters and petition letters are tailored to their individual credentials to best persuade a USCIS officer that our clients meet the requirements of the category they are applying under and therefore their petitions deserve to be approved. To provide the best EB-1 and EB-2 NIW services, our law firm only selects attorneys who have received their professional Juris Doctor degrees from the top law schools in the U.S. and who have garnered rigorous analytical skills through years of experience.