$103,265 H-1B Fee: What DHS’s Proposed Rule Says
DHS has proposed a new $103,265 fee for cap-subject H-1B petitions, potentially raising costs for employers and changing visa strategies.
The Department of Homeland Security has proposed an additional $103,265 fee for every cap-subject H-1B petition, including petitions under the U.S. advanced-degree exemption. The charge would be due when the petition is filed and would come on top of other applicable government fees, according to USCIS.
The fee is not yet in effect. It appears in a notice of proposed rulemaking published on August 25, 2026, and is subject to a 30-day public-comment period before DHS may issue a final rule. The proposal does not specify when a final fee would take effect.
If finalized, the measure could sharply increase the cost of hiring workers through the annual H-1B cap. DHS itself estimates that it would significantly affect 11,051 small entities, representing 76% of the small entities that filed cap-subject petitions in fiscal year 2025, according to the proposed rule.
What Does the H-1B Fee Proposal Really Say?
The proposal would apply at the petition stage—not during the initial electronic registration. Only employers whose registrations are selected and who proceed with cap-subject H-1B petitions would face the additional charge.
Key provisions include:
- Fee: $103,265 per cap-subject H-1B petition
- Timing: Payable when the petition is filed
- Additional cost: Imposed on top of other required fees or payments
- Covered cases: Regular-cap petitions and U.S. advanced-degree petitions
- Excluded cases: Cap-exempt petitions, including petitions by institutions of higher education, affiliated non-profit entities, nonprofit or governmental research organizations, as well as petitions for workers who have already been counted against the cap
DHS calculated the fee by dividing approximately $8.78 billion in government immigration-system costs by a projected 85,000 annual petitions. The agency says the revenue would support adjudications, fraud detection, security vetting, immigration courts, consular processing, labor enforcement and other operations across several federal agencies, as detailed in the Federal Register notice.
Based on our team’s review, the implementation timeline remains difficult to predict because DHS must complete the notice-and-comment rulemaking process, which commonly takes six months or longer. However, DHS may seek to finalize the rule before the next H-1B cap filing season begins in April 2027.
We also expect the rule to face legal challenges. However, filing a lawsuit would not automatically prevent the rule from taking effect, and nationwide relief may not be available. Because litigation can take months or longer, the fee could affect many employers and foreign professionals while any legal challenge remains pending.
This proposal is separate from the earlier $100,000 H-1B payment required under a 2025 presidential proclamation. In June 2026, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts vacated the DHS guidance implementing that payment. The government appealed, but in July 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit declined to reinstate the payment while the appeal is pending. As a result, USCIS is not currently collecting the $100,000 payment, although the government’s appeal on the merits remains pending.
What Does the H-1B Fee Mean for Current and Future Applicants?
Because employers file H-1B petitions, the direct financial obligation would fall on sponsoring organizations rather than individual workers. Applicants could nevertheless feel the effects if employers reduce sponsorship, prioritize only the most critical roles or limit hiring to candidates whose expected value justifies the added cost.
Current H-1B workers may be less exposed. Petitions that are not subject to the annual cap—generally including qualifying extensions and job changes for workers already counted against the cap—would not carry the proposed fee under the rule as written. However, a worker moving from cap exempt to cap-subject employment and previously not counted against the cap may still be subject to the proposed fee.
Prospective applicants and employers should remember that this remains a proposal. Its scope, amount or implementation could change following public comments and before any final rule takes effect.
Employers and foreign professionals may wish to reassess their immigration strategies before the next H-1B cap season. Depending on the position and the candidate’s qualifications, possible options may include employment with a cap-exempt organization or O-1 classification for individuals who can demonstrate sustained distinction in their field. Because these alternatives have different eligibility and sponsorship requirements, employers and candidates should evaluate them early.
North America Immigration Law Group can help qualified professionals and their employers evaluate whether the O-1 visa may provide an alternative path. Contact our legal team to discuss whether O-1 classification may fit your background and employment plans.
The key to our success is the way in which we present supporting evidence and provide the highest quality petition letters. With over 64,000 I-140 EB-1 ( EB-1A Alien of Extraordinary Ability; EB-1B Outstanding Researcher or Professor), EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver) and O-1 approvals, our firm has acquired substantial information about USCIS decisions, which gives us significant advantage over firms that only handle a small number of cases.
Based on our close track of USCIS internal memoranda, AAO decisions, and judicial review decisions, we have unique insight into the USCIS adjudication trends. Not only do we apply this insight into our approaches to our clients' cases, but we also carefully review all RFEs (Requests for Evidence), NOIDs (Notices of Intent to Deny), approvals, and denials issued on our cases so that we can further increase our understanding of USCIS strategies and decision-making processes. With the insight, we are able to advise our clients on the best ways to proceed with their petitions.
While other petitioners and attorneys may still use templates to draft recommendation letters or petition letters, our clients' recommendation letters and petition letters are tailored to their individual credentials to best persuade a USCIS officer that our clients meet the requirements of the category they are applying under and therefore their petitions deserve to be approved. To provide the best EB-1 and EB-2 NIW services, our law firm only selects attorneys who have received their professional Juris Doctor degrees from the top law schools in the U.S. and who have garnered rigorous analytical skills through years of experience.



