Case Study: Industry NIW Approval for a Time-Sensitive TPS Holder

Industry NIW Approval for a Time-Sensitive TPS Holder Through Customized Legal Strategy and Merit Reframing

This case involved an industry professional facing significant immigration uncertainty. The client was in the United States under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) that was approaching expiration. Due to personal circumstances, including the urgent need to reunite with their spouse, the client required an immigration strategy that prioritized both speed and long-term stability.

Rather than treating the NIW as a one-size-fits-all filing, our legal team first evaluated the client’s overall immigration posture, visa constraints, and realistic timelines. Obtaining a timely NIW approval would not only strengthen the client’s long-term immigration prospects, but also meaningfully accelerate the green card process, making family reunification possible sooner.

Industry NIW Adjudication Realities Under Current USCIS Review

In the current USCIS adjudication climate, a strong publication record and citation history alone are often insufficient to support an industry-based NIW petition. This is especially true when the proposed employment is outside of academia. Adjudicators increasingly scrutinize whether the petitioner’s work demonstrates clear national importance, broader applicability beyond a single employer, and independent professional contribution. As a result, industry petitions are frequently challenged on the national importance prong, even when applicants have solid academic credentials.

Recognizing this adjudication environment, the strategy for this case was intentionally designed to move beyond publication and citation counts and instead establish a clear and logically structured evidentiary framework. Through detailed attorney-client discussions, we focused on articulating how the client’s expertise in surface chemistry and unit process engineering translated into real-world impact, industry-wide relevance, and alignment with national priorities in advanced manufacturing and semiconductor-related innovation.

An Industry-Focused Profile Beyond Publication Metrics

The client held a Ph.D. in Surface Chemistry and pursued an industry-based career, with proposed employment as an Advisory Scientist and Unit Process Engineer. While the client had a solid research foundation, their professional trajectory emphasized applied innovation, unit process development, and industry implementation rather than continuous academic publishing.

At the time of filing, the client had 5 peer-reviewed journal articles, including 3 first-authored publications, as well as 2 academic abstracts, one of which was first-authored. The client’s work had received 46 citations. These credentials reflected meaningful scholarly training and contribution, but the case was not positioned as a publication-intensive or citation-driven NIW petition. Instead, it required a strategy that accurately captured the client’s broader technical impact and national relevance.

Strategic Construction of National Importance and Evidentiary Cohesion

Importantly, the client’s research had received substantial funding support from major organizations, including the Semiconductor Research Corporation (SRC), Intel, and Tokyo Electron Limited (TEL). Such funding is competitively awarded and reserved for research that advances national interests, particularly in semiconductor technology, advanced manufacturing efficiency, and innovation with broad economic and societal implications. This funding history provided independent, third-party validation of the significance and applicability of the client’s work beyond traditional academic metrics.

The support letter strategy was deliberately structured to reinforce this narrative from multiple, complementary angles. Four expert letters, including both dependent and independent recommenders, were assigned distinct roles within the evidentiary framework. Rather than repeating generic endorsements, each letter addressed different aspects of the case, such as the client’s technical contributions, funded research projects, publication record, and the broader importance and benefits of the work. Independent experts provided field-level validation, while the overall structure ensured that the evidence functioned as a cohesive whole rather than isolated components.

Rather than presenting the petition as one centered on heavy publication volume, the case established a well-supported connection between the client’s expertise, competitively funded research, professional impact, and national interest. This integrated approach allowed USCIS to evaluate the client’s ability and contributions based on substance, relevance, and real-world significance, not publication metrics alone.

Attorney-Led Strategy and Hands-On Collaboration

Instead of relying on a predefined academic framework, we took a strategy-driven and attorney-led approach tailored to the client’s specific background and constraints. For industry-based NIW petitions, where national importance is often closely scrutinized, how the case is developed and presented can be just as critical as the underlying credentials.

Through frequent attorney-client strategy calls, we worked closely with the client to refine and clearly articulate the real-world impact of their work in surface chemistry and unit process development, how their expertise addressed issues of national importance beyond a single employer, and the broader applicability of their technical knowledge across related industries and processes. These elements were revisited and calibrated throughout the preparation process to ensure consistency across the petition narrative and supporting evidence.

Throughout the preparation process, the client and attorney spoke multiple times per week to address questions, manage anxiety, and set realistic expectations. We also discussed alternative immigration pathways as contingency planning, ensuring that the client remained informed and supported regardless of outcome.

Working collaboratively with our team, we focused on executing a cohesive, evidence-driven narrative centered on national importance and independent professional merit, rather than relying on publication metrics alone. This hands-on, attorney-led process allowed the case to move forward efficiently without imposing unnecessary document burdens on the client.

Our role was not to ask the client to “fit” a traditional NIW petition, but to reframe existing, verifiable strengths in a way that aligned with current adjudication standards and the realities of industry-based scientific and engineering work.

This attorney-led, highly customized strategy resulted in the client’s NIW approval in approximately two months, despite the initially challenging profile.

More Than an NIW Filing: A Client-Centered Immigration Strategy

While the facts of this case are specific, the approach behind it is not. The strategy applied here reflects how we evaluate and structure NIW petitions more broadly, particularly for industry professionals facing complex timelines, heightened adjudication scrutiny, or personal urgency.

This case illustrates a core principle of our practice: We do not select only “strong” cases, nor do we rely on templates.

We assess each client’s visa status, urgency, personal circumstances, and long-term goals, and design an immigration strategy that best serves the individual, not just the petition. In time-sensitive and high-stakes situations such as this one, thoughtful legal strategy and close collaboration can make a decisive difference.

Proven Results in a Heightened Adjudication Climate

In the current immigration adjudication climate, where USCIS scrutiny has increased across employment-based categories, measurable outcomes matter. While many firms reference “high success rates” in general terms, few provide verifiable, case-volume–backed data that allows prospective clients to understand performance in context.

At North America Immigration Law Group (Chen Immigration Law Associates), we take a transparent, data-driven approach to evaluating outcomes. Under our Approval or Refund® service, between January 2020 and December 2024, the firm achieved an overall success rate of 98.44% across 34,061 cases.

This performance spans multiple employment-based immigrant visa categories:

EB-2 NIW: 99.52% approval rate, based on 28,946 approvals
EB-1A: 91.76% approval rate, based on 4,322 approvals
EB-1B: 98.51% approval rate, based on 793 approvals

These results are particularly notable given the increasingly rigorous review standards applied by USCIS during this period, especially for industry-based NIW petitions where national importance and independent impact are closely examined.

Rather than relying on generalized claims, we publish detailed, verifiable approval data to provide clients with a clear understanding of what has been achieved in practice. This commitment to transparency reflects how we approach case strategy more broadly: with evidence, accountability, and a focus on outcomes that withstand heightened adjudication scrutiny.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Do you use templates for NIW petitions?

No. We do not rely on pre-set templates or formulaic petition structures.

In this case, the client did not fit the typical “publication-heavy” NIW profile. Instead of forcing the facts into a standard framework, the attorney worked closely with the client to reframe their professional contributions, focusing on real-world impact, national importance, and independent merit. Every argument in the petition was tailored to the client’s actual background, visa situation, and adjudication risks.

Each NIW case we handle is built from the ground up based on the individual, not a template. This distinction is particularly critical for industry-based NIW petitions, where national importance must be actively constructed rather than presumed.

Do clients need to provide extensive documents or materials to qualify for NIW?

No. Our approach emphasizes strategic extraction of existing strengths, not burdening clients with unnecessary document requests.

In this case, the client did not have recent publications or a high citation count. Rather than asking the client to generate additional materials, the legal team focused on identifying and articulating merits that already existed within the client’s professional record. Through detailed discussions, we helped surface impactful aspects of the client’s work that are often overlooked without legal guidance.

Our role is to do the heavy analytical work so clients can focus on their careers, not paperwork.

Do you only accept “strong” NIW cases?

No. We routinely handle challenging and time-sensitive cases, including those with non-traditional profiles or elevated risk factors.

This client faced multiple challenges, including an expiring TPS status, significant personal urgency, and a professional profile that did not align with common NIW assumptions. Rather than declining the case, we evaluated the full immigration context and designed a strategy that balanced urgency, risk, and long-term outcomes.

Many of our successful NIW approvals involve cases that initially appear “weak” on paper but become approvable through thoughtful legal strategy and precise framing.

Do you only evaluate a client’s case based on the petition they have retained?

No. We do not limit our analysis to the single petition a client has already retained.

In this case, although the client retained us for an NIW petition, our legal analysis began with a broader review of the client’s visa status, timeline constraints, personal circumstances, and immigration risk profile. The NIW strategy was developed only after considering how it would interact with the client’s expiring TPS status and family reunification goals.

Our role is not to simply prepare the retained petition in isolation, but to ensure that it fits into a coherent, client-centered immigration strategy. This may include adjusting positioning, setting realistic expectations, and discussing alternatives or contingencies, even when those discussions go beyond the narrow scope of the retained case.

This holistic approach allows us to protect the client’s broader interests, particularly in time-sensitive or high-stakes situations.

What made this case successful despite the challenges?

The approval resulted from close attorney-client collaboration, strategic reframing of merits, and a team-based approach that emphasized substance over form. Equally important, the strategy applied in this case was informed by data derived from scale.

As one of the firms that has handled the largest volume of employment-based immigrant petitions in the industry, North America Immigration Law Group (Chen Immigration Law Associates) has accumulated a highly granular dataset based on almost 64,000 approved cases. This depth of experience allows us to identify emerging adjudication patterns, understand how USCIS applies evolving standards in practice, and adapt legal strategy accordingly rather than relying on static assumptions.

In this case, that data-driven perspective informed how national importance was framed, how evidence was structured, and how potential adjudication concerns were proactively addressed. Combined with individualized guidance and realistic expectation-setting, this approach proved decisive in a high-stakes, time-sensitive situation where both immigration outcomes and personal circumstances were closely intertwined.

--------------------------------------------

North America Immigration Law Group (Chen Immigration Law Associates) is a U.S. immigration law firm dedicated to representing corporations, research institutions, and individuals from all 50 U.S. states regarding I-140 immigration petitions. We specialize in employment-based immigration petition and have a proven record of high success rate for the categories of: EB2-NIW (National Interest Waiver), EB1-A (Alien of Extraordinary Ability), EB1-B (Outstanding Researcher/Professor) and O-1 (Alien of Extraordinary Ability).

Our Ten Thousand I-140 Approvals Provide Unprecedented Insight into the USCIS Adjudication Trend

With more than 58,000 EB-1A, EB-1B, EB-2 NIW and O-1 cases approved, we have first hand information on the manner in which the USCIS adjudicate I-140 cases. As the USCIS has constantly changed its adjudication standards for the EB-1A, EB-1B and EB-2 NIW categories, our firm's huge database of successful cases gives you unprecedented insight to USCIS adjudication trends. We carefully analyze the data for all of our cases and apply the results of our analyses toward giving our clients up-to-date advice and adapting our strategies such that we remain on par with the ever-shifting landscape of immigration law in the U.S. With us, you will always have access to important updates, strategies, and information so that you can make the most informed decisions about your case.

We Have Helped Tens of Thousands of Clients with Credentials and Backgrounds Similar to Yours

With our exceedingly large number of successful petitions, no matter what credentials you have, no matter your background and field of expertise, no matter your visa status or nationality, chances are we have helped hundreds or even thousands of clients just like you. Our clients are usually impressed with how well we understand their research and work. Our insight and understanding stems from the fact that we have handled many cases with elements similar to yours already, and this helps us devise the best strategies for each individual petition.

Vast Majority of Clients Came to Us Because of Referrals

For years, our firm has attracted new clients based solely on word of mouth, recommendations, and the positive collaboration experiences shared with them by their friends and family. We take pride in our reputation and work hard to ensure that we provide a green card application experience that our clients are happy to share with their friends and colleagues. That is how our cumulative total of approved cases grew from 600 in 2013 to over 58,000 in 2025.